There has been the increasing use of chemicals in food production and preservation. Do dangers outweigh advantages ?
It is widely acknowledged that most of the foods in markets and groceries that are hugely purchased have chemicals as these make products improve as well as can stay for a longer period. From my perspective. I extremely believe that the dangers of packed meals are greater than the advantages for some reasons.
On the one hand, there are several merits of using chemicals in food production and preservation, linked to making food look impressive and cost-effective. With regard to the former, those chemicals are added to make products look catchy to the eye of consumers. For instance, rainbow candy uses vibrant coloring in order to attract kids to purchase when they first seeing. When it comes to the latter, most companies inform customers that packaging food is totally safe and does not cause any side effects with the aim of saving costs for the items. For example, a cup to produce instant noodles is the main reason leading to health problems. Moreover, the material to make cups is very inexpensive compared to the price they sell.
On the other hand, those harmful substances contain several drawbacks, the most significant of which are causing health problems and less nutrition. In terms of the first idea, the chemicals added to the food either during its manufacture or conservation lead to considerably serious diseases. For example, cancer and diabetes are considered the main health problems that are currently faced by our society as it is mainly due to many people's reactions to food additives. As far as the second point is concerned, chemical food results in losing its nutritional value as compared to freshly grown produce. For instance, canned food is sold in convenience stores, which does not contain the high value of nutrition for consumers.
In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that despite the positive effects using chemicals in food production and preservation can exert, the harmful implications should not be underestimated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...saving costs for the items. For example, a cup to produce instant noodles is the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13664596273 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81456939095 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2628512412 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.266666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226084811461 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709727752521 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689883969194 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149881927064 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425943614577 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.