There has been the increasing use of chemicals in food production and preservation. Do dangers outweigh advantages ?
It is widely acknowledged that most of the foods in markets and groceries that are hugely purchased have chemicals as these make products improve as well as can stay for a longer period. From my perspective. I extremely believe that the dangers of packed meals are greater than the advantages for some reasons.
On the one hand, there are several merits of using chemicals in food production and preservation, linked to making food look impressive and long-term storage. With regard to the former, those chemicals are added to make products look catchy. For instance, rainbow candy uses vibrant coloring to attract kids to purchase it when they first see it. When it comes to the latter, most of the food production is added chemicals with the aim of dragging on the time and the scent of food. For example, the instant noodle cup is the best invention because the taste does not change no matter how long the noodles are.
On the other hand, those harmful substances contain several drawbacks, the most significant of which are that they cause health problems and less nutrition. In terms of the first idea, the chemicals added to the food either during its manufacture or conservation lead to considerably serious diseases. For example, cancer and diabetes are considered the main health problems that are currently faced by our society, as they are mainly due to many people's reactions to food additives. As far as the second point is concerned, chemical food results in losing its nutritional value as compared to freshly grown produce. For instance, canned food is sold in convenience stores which does not contain a high value of nutrition for consumers.
In conclusion, I am inclined to believe that despite the positive effects using chemicals in food production and preservation can exert, the harmful implications should not be underestimated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06840390879 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75535377958 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57328990228 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0100290055 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258640124297 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867724615907 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718683738171 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16510192413 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491199715732 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.