Nowadays, men have the tendency to take over the role as househusband, while women are gradually become breadwinners in a family. The reasons for this situation can be several, and I would contend that it is a positive trend.
During the past decades, women tended to stay at home doing house chores and taking care of children. In recent years, due to the advocation of equal right movements, not only did women gain the qualifications to pursue careers, but the stereotype of staying at home is becoming vague. In other words, it has been gradually acceptable that husbands quit from the labor market and support their wives working instead. Another factor for this might be the cost of living are higher compared to the past. Rational couples have to decide to let the one who earns more in a family to take over the roles to work.
From my perspective, I would argue that the changes aforementioned should be seen as progress. Equal opportunity between genders has become the norm in an increasing number of countries. Similarly, men should be free to leave their job and in order to take the responsibility of taking care of children. For instance, gender equality has been promoted intensely. Now, nearly 20% of men in Taiwan choose to stay at home and encourage their wives to pursue their careers. If women do not need to sacrifice their chances to go working, equally, men do not need to put under pressure to go to work.
By way of conclusion, the changing roles between genders indicate the advance in a society, and I believe this trend is desirable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, while, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78676470588 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68639079468 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580882352941 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1112948467 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300873243677 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920237044815 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063611471712 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156618976786 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798054240072 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.