Today single-use products become more and more popular. People have to switch to using these products only. Do you agree or disagree?
The question of durability of ordinary items has always been highly debatable in all the societies. Nowadays it is discussed that such trendy disposable goods have to totally displace the multi-use things in everyday life. I completely disagree with this statement and believe that reusable objects are more reasonable for exploitation.
First of all, usage of renowned in the modern society throwaway products is economically unprofitable for the average person. This is because deploying one-time things, it becomes necessary to buy a new one in order to use it again, while reusable items are bought once and customed until it gets useless. Therefore, consumption of multi-use goods is cheaper and reduces personal’s budget expenditures. For example, Starbucks coffeehouse chain reported that people who drink from their reusable cups save 10% of their monthly spending compared to those who prefer disposable ones. In other words, it is much cheaper to buy once and exploit it for a long time than to buy a new one every time.
Second of all, the materials from which the products are made harm the environment. It means that there are approximately no materials in the world that would decompose quickly and harmlessly to nature, and disposable items are produced in larger quantities. Proceeding from this, people buy a thing, use it once, then throw it away, and then buy the same thing again because of this, the amount of used items that will decompose for decades only increase from year to year. For instance, Delivery Club, one of the main players in the food delivery market in Russia, delivers 2 million orders per month, and each order up to a kilogram of plastic, which will decompose for a hundred years, releasing toxic substances into the air, soil and water. Thus, long-term fixtures will reduce the amount of toxic materials produced.
In conclusion, low cost and less hazardous to the environment are important advantages of reusable products over disposable ones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17283950617 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74680260561 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58950617284 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3530788278 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139657579589 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450731521973 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383627561466 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829475543377 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207961461424 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.