Along with the development of technology, there has been an increase in scientific researches, especially in space research. Despite the tremendous benefits from investing money to scientific researches on space, some people are of the opinion that money can be used for other more useful purposes. Personally, I agree with this idea to some extent and I would like to account for the reasons in this essay.
On the one hand, scientific achievement’s end purpose is to serve for human, but if the human is dying from poverty before receiving the benefit of researches then it makes no sense to do researching. In other words, in some countries whose citizens are struggling with poverty, money is better off to be used in order to raise the life quality of people. A case in point is the refugees in some East Asia countries can be saved if they have clean water to drink. Compared to space research, this brings a tremendous meaning for numerous amount of people.
On the other hand, rather than spending a huge amount of money on space research at this moment, it could be spent on education first. No sensible person can deny the fact that investing in education is the wisest investment. To be precise, from education’s investment, the poverty will soon disappear as well as many other talents can be nurtured. These talents then can contribute to the research in the future, when poverty is no longer exist in the world.
To conclude, one cannot deny the benefits of space research may bring to human, but it is much more important to wisely spend money on solving poverty and creating a better education. In doing so, the space research could have the opportunity to obtain more achievements in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, well, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86440677966 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78587564893 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535593220339 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3801000464 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268806725609 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984464608552 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786573498283 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176132341987 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470895422574 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.