Topic: Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that starvation and poverty could only be addressed by the economic progress, while others contend that allowing the progress of economy will inevitably affect the environment in a damaging way and so it must be stopped. In my opinion, the welfare of our own humankind is of vital importance and we cannot afford it without damaging the environment. Therefore, the sustainable development concept is preferable to any state’s economic policy.
Economic growth has always been the most sensible way to go for ending hunger and poverty all over the world. By spurring the economic progress, more jobs are created to feed such development. People, in turn, joining the workforce where they contribute actively and get paid to afford food and other necessities. As seen in most industrialized nations, the numbers of people living under the poverty line are far fewer than those in the underdeveloped ones such as Asian and much of Africa. Statistically, economic growth index is directly proportional to the poverty rate and there is no other way of addressing the problem in question in the absence of economic development.
On the other hand, there is incontrovertible evidence that human is the major contributor to environmental destruction. To serve the purpose of boosting the economy, we have heavily exploited natural resources for farmlands, accommodation, and industrial material input. This leads to global warming expected to cause climate catastrophe that ultimately causes a heavy toll for human beings in the foreseeable future. Developing the economy in a sustainable way will effectively deal with the two above problems. Nations should be forced to adopt a policy in which economic progress is coupled with sustainable resources’ exploitation as well as the widespread deployment of environmental improvement such as binding emissions targets. Only when such policy is effectively enforced at a global level, humans are able to avoid suffering and dying either from hunger or climate disasters.
In conclusion, humans could alleviate serious repercussions to the environment by forcing every country on the globe to adopt sustainable economic development along with many other environmental protection policies. In any case, human survival and prosperity should be our first priority and environmental destruction is an inevitable sacrifice to achieve such aim as was in the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eseeable future. Developing the economy in a sustainable way will effectively deal with the two abov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ither from hunger or climate disasters. In conclusion, humans could alleviate se...
^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to achieve such aim as was in the past.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in any case, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.488 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19298787275 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581333333333 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8641237382 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.625 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251745587197 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733855356837 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810525029424 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151204046887 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880913982998 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.