Trees are essential for the existence of the human race as they provide the oxygen that we need to survice. Yet, daily all around the globe large areas of woodland are being detroyed. Many people feel that they as individuals can do nothing and that only governments and large companies can halt the distriction. How far do you agree or disagree with this.
In today’s industrialize society, environmental problems, especially deforestation are among the most about issue of many countries over the world. This is a huge issue which many people feel that only governments and large companies can solve this problem. It also seems individuals are unable to do. I personally disagree with this with several reasons.
Firstly, it is undoubted that any action of people can yield the positive impacts. The person understands the importance of tree in their life by providing oxygen, improving air quality, which influences their health directly, thus they have to protect trees. They can plan trees surrounding the place where they are living. Trees also could be planted in school, children should be taught to look after and care for them. Understanding the value of trees, young people will preserve trees.
Secondly, citizens can join hands with governments to deal with this issue. Plenty of large areas of woodland are destroyed which causes natural disasters such as landslide, floods, etc. Not only assets of people is damaged but people also are killed. That is the reason why any individuals contribute to the governments to arrest any person cutting trees illegally so that the deforestation can be prevented.
Last but not least, person can use other materials to replace woods in construction field. It means that the exploitation of wood can be limited. This is also positive effect. This action also makes the process of producing goods developed.
To sum up, trees are essential for our existence. Preventing the destruction is not only our responsibilities but also the government’s that give the strict laws on woodland protection.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94877157004 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.100983671 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7894736842 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2105263158 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251248085629 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693267346921 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515653281542 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123611476872 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513354728854 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.