Thanks to the development of technology, communicate by using social network is becoming more and more popular than the face to face ways. While I accept that these trend can sometimes have a positive effect on society, I still believe that they are more likely to have harmful impacts.
On the one hand, communicating by social network can be convenient and help us contact people easier. Social network users could easily communicate with others with only a computer and a stability internet. For example, in recent years, a contract between two multinational corporations could be signed in two different continents of the world. Furthermore, thanks to these available conditions, we are sitting in front of computers, or holding hand-held phones, for hours surfing the internet and reading Facebook news to update every change immediately throughout the world.
However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Because of spending hours every day sitting with computer or phones. These users will sooner or later become more and more passive which link to the sedentary lifestyle and lack of communication with others. Therefore, these people could forget the important and value of the real life interaction among people, especially with close people such as their parent, grand parent or siblings. Additionally, the most serious problem is the fear that human species might become robot, or emotionless machine. For instance, the connection with classmate of children is faded nowadays when they are paying too much attention for social networks such as Facebook or Instagram instead of face to face talks.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of using social network are more significant than the possible profits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31672597865 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77613831326 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604982206406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3993443099 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143397137471 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483154170465 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577953561149 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873954116499 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355537129334 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.