Waste recycling
some people argue that there are lots of wastes which do not enter the recycling processes. they believe that governmental and legal forces are the only way to rise waste's recycling. I think that laws are necessary as a requirement for it, although these are not enough for its implementation.
I think that controlling the process of recycling can not fully be accomplished by government. Existence of some laws is mandatory to force individuals and especially companies to supervise on the wastes that are generating. these rules are mostly performable for residents of big complexes and factories rather than private and detached houses. For example, the government can specify disposal bins for different types of wastes and ask users to put the wastes in their special containers. Beside it, regular supervisory and punishment are essential for who deny these rules and do not obey them.
On the other hand, there are home users who controlling them and inhibiting solutions might not be as effective as companies and complexes. I believe that here training would be more economical compared to controlling and following stringent rules. For example, there are lots of non-recyclable materials like nylon and plastic which people can use it less to protect the environment and facilitate recycling. If people can control using plastic and limit the usage of wood made materials like napkin or paper, they will significantly help the government to perform waste recycling more efficient. So, individuals will give help to conserve their natural environment instead of forcing through rules or punishments.
In short, I think that implementing any process in society needs predefined rules and waste recycling is not an exception. However, these rules are not enough for implementation and training play a vital role in such environmental friendly activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people argue that there are lots of was...
^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...h do not enter the recycling processes. they believe that governmental and legal for...
^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...vise on the wastes that are generating. these rules are mostly performable for reside...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...visory and punishment are essential for who deny these rules and do not obey them. ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, i think, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37627118644 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01552051491 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6982489676 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289981730799 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101691998738 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111148034652 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199990835967 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402099908522 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.