Architecture is always one of the essential aspects that impressing the economy and the culture of a country. Thus, there is a discussion over the issue of whether the function of the buildings should be ranked above its aesthetic meaning. Personally, I suppose that these features are not conflicting and beneficial mutual.
There is no point in denying that the recent traveling tendency is that people prefer to attract the visual qualities of buildings than the lifeless ones, despite the full function of them. To be specific, tourists nowadays like taking a photo with the unique architecture than the common ones because of the fact that only few netizens enjoy the picture within casual things on social media. In addition, the artistic value is also the symbol reflecting the local, the surrounding area of the building. Therefore, the outside look of buildings significantly influences the tourism of the country.
In terms of intended using, while performing the esthetic external, architecture must be required completely about ordinary objectives such as durability and modern facilities owing to the safety of the citizens. In particular, if the structure of a building does not maintain the stability and the disaster, like storm or flood, comes randomly, it will cause the accidents of humans and infrastructure. Besides, tourists will not visit again some hotels which have bad drainage, lighting systems as well as the illogical arrangement of rooms and hallway, in spite of the luxurious outside.
In general view, both of them equally contribute to the potential of architecture. I strongly believe that these factors are indispensable when we design a building in order to create an ideal habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...nique architecture than the common ones because of the fact that only few netizens enjoy the picture wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, while, i suppose, in addition, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30656934307 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91552620232 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64598540146 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5850116458 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.166666667 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110854142005 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033434878895 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366486891577 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619412693195 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289573802114 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.