why people tend to buy brand's goods? do this have a positive or negative impacts?
In recent years, people more interested in purchasing modern goods with the well-known brands than the past. The car, clothes, watch are the samples of these means. There are variety reasons for this trend. Also, in my opinion this event has cons and pros impacts on the people themselves, and society. My reasons for these positions mentioned as follows.
About the my reasons for this trend I should say that, firstly, it assists to boost of confidence. Nowadays, many people pay attention to the appearance instead of human’s character, and choose their friends based on this issue. For this reason, the shy, and lack confidence people have to wear brand clothes or buying luxury car for improving communication in relationships. In addition, the brand products have usually high quality than ordinary device, and even have positive effects on your body. For example, the buying of high quality shoes can help to people who suffer from back pain while, ordinary shoes are not like that.
Overall, advent of each phenomenon, however, has a positive and negative affect on all member of society. About the purchasing famous brands on the one hand, create a competition among producers that is a pros result. It causes that, famous companies effort for producing high quality products in order to persuade people for providing that. By doing this, we will see increased in the high quality in products because of competitive space. On the other hand, these goods have a higher cost than ordinary goods therefore, the poor families cannot afford to providing these. Hence, their children will feel hopeless, lose of confidence, and even can lead to deleterious mental problems for them at the future.
To sum up, this is a fact that, people are fond of providing brand goods for different reasons such as the boost of their confidence, or high quality of them. Nonetheless, I believe that this development has a positive impacts such as, creating a competitive space among companies, and also, negative impacts like inability poor families for providing it, and destructive impacts that it will had on their children at the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'my'?
Suggestion: the; my
...itions mentioned as follows. About the my reasons for this trend I should say tha...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 74, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...n, however, has a positive and negative affect on all member of society. About the purcha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...s a pros result. It causes that, famous companies effort for producing high quality produ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...peless, lose of confidence, and even can lead to deleterious mental problems for ...
^^
Line 13, column 394, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...t, and destructive impacts that it will had on their children at the future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11931818182 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61754740726 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5091311247 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287644174694 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087827966649 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541989666008 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188637945272 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288005073872 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.