Write about the following topic.
Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
An athletic plays one of the best role in human life and it makes active and healthy body. A few people take a training and they win medals at the Olympics. Many may say, governments should provide fund for organising some motivational programmes for people to be active and healthy. To me, I agree with this phenomenon for many worthwhile reasons, as described in this essay.
In the countryside, many people have sports talent, but they do not know about the Olympics because they have no technical gadgets for listening news. If government should give some fund for providing knowledge about the athletics, many people take a training and take a part in the international competitions. For example, Narendhra Modi, who is the recent prime minister of India, provided some fund for athletics, when he was the chief minister of Gujarat. He created one program (Khelmahakumbh) for encouraged to all students and athleters, as a result many students,who came from the countryside, took a part in the competition of games.
Furthermore, medals and gifts are necessary to the winners. If government should organise programmes and give prices and medals to the winners, people motivate from winners. Sports improve our health and all people become healthy is a benefit of country as well as country's people.
On the other hand, government has organised some programmes but people do not take a part and ignores; therefore, money wasted from this program.
In conclusion, in case government should not provide funds for encourage people, people do not interest to join the sports; therefore, I agree with the government should provide some money for encouraging people and reasons have discussed in this essay.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: Much may; A good deal of may
...ng and they win medals at the Olympics. Many may say, governments should provide fund fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...say, governments should provide fund for organising some motivational programmes ...
^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the countryside, many people have sports talent, but they do not know about the O...
^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one program Khelmahakumbh for encouraged to all students and athleters, as a resu...
^^
Line 3, column 571, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , who
...and athleters, as a result many students,who came from the countryside, took a part...
^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ters, as a result many students,who came from the countryside, took a part in the...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prices and medals to the winners, people motivate from winners. Sports improve ou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14695340502 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83448873402 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523297491039 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2013696506 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207073412133 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856959050135 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663952373835 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13562762419 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708509825504 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.