You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Being an editors are sometimes stressful due to decision of publishing a news. Bad and good news have their own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the job of editors is to carefully select which one is suitable for appearing in the news.
There are two conditions to make up an informative news. First is the character of the information. Usually, humans tend to be attracted to bad news over good ones. Hence, shocking news are regularly more favored than the good ones. For example, readers will unintentionally pay more attention to an earthquake, a storm or a flood in order to survive. Second is reader's curiosity. It is a human personality, so people are likely to care about other people’s secrets, especially the celerity. Consequently, rumors and spoilers of a singer which easily stimulate reader’s interest is frequently printed on the cover.
There is a debate whether they should present more negative news or positive bulletins should be dominant. Even though bad news is appealed more views, it is not always the center of the Earth. It does create some worry and gloomy sensation but it is still a must-have information to build people's caution about life. Instead of writing all those mentioned above, happy ending ones should be concerned to broadcast more by the journalists to balance the information for viewers. The nice stories will help people optimistic and realize that life does not only contain the crimes, the calamities and the terrors but also many amazing things people willing to do for each others.
In conclusion, the media team should weigh the pros and cons before reporting the bulletins. Equalizing those bad and good news a make people love each other and enjoy their life more without forgetting being warned by the negative news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an editor' or simply 'editors'?
Suggestion: an editor; editors
Being an editors are sometimes stressful due to decision...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...stressful due to decision of publishing a news. Bad and good news have their own advan...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'informative news'.
Suggestion: informative news
... There are two conditions to make up an informative news. First is the character of the informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13220338983 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81415145903 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596610169492 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1508534249 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3888888889 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0636182595945 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232395090457 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209411380934 0.0667982634062 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400634690494 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168366749141 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.