You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
editor’s choice. Even in the word “news” has this feature – new. The earth always moves, so does the life. Citizens always have demand to acquire the latest events which are happening around them.
There is a debate whether these social communicated channel should be provided more bad or good bulletins. Actually, these are two sides of social life. So they should equalize these two aspects. Let’s imagine that all the news are awful, for instances crime, rape, thief, impoverishment… People will get zero point for hope, no faith between people and maybe no co-operation would occur. Vice versa, if the bulletins are all about how amazing people is, how fantastic that doctors can save thousand of lives and cure every diseases and how beautiful many nations treat each others, people will never see and be warned about robberies, rape, medical failures, wars, natural resources dearth…
To sum up, being an information-connection team, which has a huge impact to the population, editors should selectively choose the best news to broadcast and weigh the pros and cons in every single word appeared in screen or paper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Editor&apos
editor's choice. Even in the word 'news&a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...is, how fantastic that doctors can save thousand of lives and cure every diseases and ho...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
..., rape, medical failures, wars, natural resources dearth… To sum up, being an inform...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, may, so, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 41.998997996 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 185.0 315.596192385 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29189189189 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89733763586 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.724324324324 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 154.503825515 49.4020404114 313% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 122.375 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0820416352605 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030589401867 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270687509653 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558204709274 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00982737332855 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.