Adult youths ore often called up for working for the development of communities. Do you think they should work voluntarily or should they get paid? Give your opinion.
The development of communities requires the vibrant energy of young blood. There are many programs requiring voluntary work in communities, where the young could help. I firmly believe that the monetary incentives should be there to ascertain the involvement of young adults in such ventures.
The most important reason for making voluntary work being paid is that the younger generation needs pocket money to satiate their material desires. Youth are lured by the glamour of the consumeristic society. The paid voluntary work would give them a chance to earn some of these things, and needless to say, it benefits the community. Altogether, it’s a win-win situation for both sides. What more to say, it reduces petty crime, as some youngster’s resort to unethical way to get these things. So, an incentive is needed to increase the compliance for voluntary work.
Secondly, today’s youngsters have a sedentary lifestyle. They need to get motivated to do something. When they are involved in community work, they have a positive outlet to pent up their energy, rather than just wasting time energy and wasting time by sitting like a couch potato. If they know, they will get paid up for the work they would be willingly doing work and would channelize their energy in the right direction.
Finally, this monetary incentive would make them put their best in whatever they do. Some may even find this as a future career option which would be helpful to the community. Unpaid work would be done half-heartedly and would not reap the best results.
To summarize, the youth should be paid for the work they took voluntarily. The monetary incentive may be a bare minimum, but it should be there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: APOSTROPHE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Consider using the plural form here: 'youngsters'.
Suggestion: youngsters
... for voluntary work. Secondly, today’s youngster’s are having a sedentary lifestyle. They ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02464788732 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69386908897 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6608250668 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2777777778 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349921408877 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106498963046 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10054363113 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185568179083 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906056632537 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.