It is undoubtedly true that combustion engines are consuming a large amount of energy resources. The question is whether these engines be banned and replaced by the electric ones. In my opinion, electric cars are the best alternative of the gasoline driven cars. I will amplify this argument by using some suitable examples before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, air and noise pollution is a factor of utmost importance which has led automobile industry to start manufacturing electric vehicles. This is to say that electric cars' engines do not produce toxic gases such as carbon dioxide and ammonia as a typical car’s does. A research conducted by the Department of Environmental Sciences of Australia states that by the introduction of electric cars on roads, air and noise pollution can be reduced by 60%. Hence, electric cars can play a vital role to overcome these environmental issues.
Additionally, low cost maintenance and efficiency are another predominant factors, which foster the need of fully hybrid cars. In other words, hybrid or electric cars are more economical and efficient in their performance compared to gas driven cars. For example, Tesla, a renowned manufacturer of electric cars claims that newly developed electric cars have the potential to reduce an average fuel consumption up to 40%. Therefore, it is safe to say that replacing traditional cars with the electric ones is a welcoming thought.
To conclude, by analyzing both points of the view, it can be shown clearly that replacing combustion engines with electric or hybrid is a great development, but implementation is quite critical. However, if, in the future, automobile manufacturers and governments make joint efforts, there is a good reason to believe that consumer will get benefits in terms of low cost along with a pollution free environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27946127946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01624498198 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9777469709 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234916990418 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861685554373 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667100249571 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138474371941 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538943519807 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.