All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same number of vacations in a year.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Corporate world is full of different types of employment options with different designations, these job profiles require various leave or vacation policies. I partially agree with the said notion as several sectors should not provide the same number of vacations to each employee and therefore should not treat each employee equally. However, in other sectors where discrimination can be seen clearly, needs parallel vacation policies with little to no difference.
Running a business in this cut-throat competition is not a small issue. Additionally, retaining employee is another problem which mostly caused by differences in the leave policies. For example, sectors like agriculture and food industry requires different vacation for categorised employees. In my country, most farmers allowed to take a vacation in summer, but the supervisors of the fields can take a yearly vacation at a different time in monsoon. Supervisors may not get the same number of vacation days as compared to farmers. In this case, it is justifiable that employers can not treat each employee equally particularly in the mater of their leaves.
On the opposite side, engineering sectors are following same leave policies throughout a year, no matter who the employee is and which position he or she is set on. If there is some difference in leave policies, it is very negligible and is not questionable by the group of employees. For example, Information Technology companies do have the one vacation policy for all their engineers and therefore employees are treated equally, regardless of their designations and duties. This is the sector where a minor tweak in the leave policy for certain employees might be considered as a discriminatory decision, because of the nature of the industry.
To deduce, I believe in the idea that leaves terms can be differ from the industry to industry and there should not be any complain regarding not treating employee equally. However, some corporate sectors and their employees are believing in the equality but it totally depends on the nature of the business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...es. In my country, most farmers allowed to take a vacation in summer, but the superviso...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e corporate sectors and their employees are believing in the equality but it totally depends ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26426426426 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95400568263 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534534534535 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4957324253 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213671783957 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694934663819 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636578754415 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135962117729 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522853982686 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.