Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give you own opinion.
Increasing air pollution has become a major issue in this decade. To reduce pollution governments and people has been taking pro-active steps for last couple of years. Some people think that by celebrating international car-free days would make a significant difference in reducing air pollution. However, others believe in the notion that there are other plenty of ways to control this predicament.
Cars are the main way of transportation nowadays and therefore people believe in the idea that international car-free days would cut the pollution drastically. It is contemplated by the United Nation that 60 percent of air pollution is caused by cars and one single day in a week or in a month might make expected impact. For instance, as per the UN guidelines people had been celebrated 2 car-free days in a month back in 2015. As a result, it undoubtedly increases the quality of air and significantly decreases air pollution with positive changes in the environment. Thus, some people today believe that car-free days are the sure shot solution.
Some ethnic groups believe that there are other ways to fight with this growing air pollution and car-free days could contribute very little to reduce it. Firstly, people who are living near the industrial zones are complaining about smokes which constantly coming out of nearby furnaces. They also suggested to the government to put restriction on that. Secondly, people believe that a single flight could consume as much diesel as a car can deplete in a year so people should avoid air traveling whenever it is possible. Finally, air quality has been deteriorating by coal-based trains so using different engine like electric or maglev train could be better options. Hence, it is believed that other options need to be considered while talking about effective ways of reducing air pollution.
To deduce, after examining both the views I can say that car-free international days can be the bullseye solution if people and government would agree on increasing the intensity of car-free days such as 2 days in a week.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11470588235 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86621381982 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0756608648 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375266899165 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125651627972 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10352001364 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242102813451 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505241804988 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.