Some parents buy and allow their children anything they ask or want. Is this a good way to raise children?
What consequences could this style of parenting have on children as they grow older?
It is argued that descendants are given everything they demand or pine-for by their parents. As per my opinion, it is not a good way to nurture them because children will take everything for granted as well as they will become stubborn. The consequences of this vogue would be mentally disturbed and they may associate with nefarious activities to fulfil their desires.
The primary reason to consider it as an improper method that children will not get aware of the hardships concomitant with procuring products. This is because parents are rendering things which are asked by their offspring, they do not have to make any efforts to achieve these items. Consequently, they will not take seriously due to easy availability. Another plausible reason of this maneuver is that children may become stubborn and timid if sometimes parents are unable to satisfy their needs. For example, I vividly remember, one of my friends, who has this type of upbringing, has become uncontrollable when his parents did not gift him the car of his choice.
There are several consequences of this kind of nurturing when children become adult. Firstly, children may suffer from mental instability, when they are unable to quench their desires. As they have only taken things from their parents effortlessly, they do not know how to earn it, which may result in mental suffering. Secondly, some time to fulfil their dreams, children may try to adopt criminal ways to earn money easily. Therefore they may become a menace for the society due to their illegal activities for personal perquisite.
By agglomerating the above factors, it is concluded that parents should not give all the things which are demanded by their children because they may become stubborn as well as irresponsible. Furthermore, the consequences are in terms of having disturbance in mental state and they may be astray.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...opt criminal ways to earn money easily. Therefore they may become a menace for the societ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1038961039 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7965083161 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529220779221 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.945509161 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367403539595 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13421395449 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513044516358 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246879032071 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351774673111 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.