The best way for the government to solve the problem of traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people opine that to alleviate the traffic congestion government should provide free public transportation round the clock. However, I have a different side to this problem. I believe that free public transit can solve traffic problem to some extent, but it is not the best viable solution, as it would lead to many other issues.
Undoubtedly, many daily commuters would be benefitted with free transportation. But such services would make the government to financial strain and is an unnecessary burden. Moreover, a considerable proportion of these services would be wasted, as these would be unused during an off-peak time, nights and weekends. Therefore, it is not practical to provide public transportation utterly free on economic grounds.
There are numerous ways to facilitate the use of public transportation and hence reduce traffic problems. Mainly, commuters are looking into comfort, frequency and rate. If the people do not have to wait time waiting for the bus or train, get comfortable seats and have to pay far less than what they would have to spend on their vehicle, then they would willingly take public transportation. So taking these steps are worth than making public transit completely free.
Additionally, the government should levy toll taxes and increase road tax as well. A Surge in fuel price also discourages the people from using personal vehicles. Media could be used to aware the people about simple measures like car-pooling. For instance, if people from a community is going in the same direction for the job then can alternatively take their car and share to commute. It is a win-win situation for the environment and people.
To sum up, having transportation completely free would not be practical to implement, as it would not be viable for the government. Therefore, it would not be the best solution. The better method would be to encourage people to use public transport by making it better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...ansportation. So taking these steps are worth than making public transit completely f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14873417722 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92558969579 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5834686299 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6315789474 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20005738431 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664057420352 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609626538023 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120935743806 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829490638298 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.