Certain individual use networking apps to be in regular touch with other people and news occasions. Do you believe benefits of this technology far greater than the drawbacks?
Although few persons use social media apps to share their own updates and receive updates from others about things happening in their lives, it is my belief that the positive effects of this phenomenon could certainly offset its disadvantages.
There are several downsides of using online-medium to be in connection with friends and family. A common criticism of this approach is that people don't realize the actual benefits of meeting an individual and are happy just to be in contact from a distance. For example, two brothers settled in two different countries, might be in contact online, but will always miss the feeling of hugging each other. Another negative aspect can be that of Identity fraud, which is rising rapidly and you can't be sure if the person sitting on the other side of desk is the right person you want to be in contact with.
Despite these negative effects, networking-apps have bought important benefits as well. One obvious advantage is that of being in touch with people whom you can't meet for various reasons. For illustration, you can think about a person after changing his job can still be in touch with former colleagues whom he had a lot of bonhomie via social media. Another example, can be of people in touch with distant relatives and sharing happiness in the form of wishing birthdays or anniversaries. This medium is also used very frequently to share pictures of travel made by some individual and giving a chance to showcase different beautiful locations. Another big positive effect of online social apps is the opportunity it gives to look and refer each other to work. For instance, if a person is seeking a job and one of his network connections is aware of a job opening, he can refer him helping in a big way.
In conclusion, even though, this online medium has some shortcomings in the form of not realizing the value of actual touch or identity theft, I personally feel that the positives of being in touch with colleagues and distant relatives or to refer people to correct jobs have brought us more advantages than disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...iticism of this approach is that people dont realize the actual benefits of meeting ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in contact from a distance. For example, two brothers settled in two different co...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... fraud, which is rising rapidly and you cant be sure if the person sitting on the ot...
^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... of being in touch with people whom you cant meet for various reasons. For illustrat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86797752809 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71555129737 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5949692668 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.307692308 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281444384444 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102067635502 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399199991721 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16342043346 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473352114588 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.