Some people think it is good to raise children in a city Others argue that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think it is good to raise children in a city. Others argue that it is better for children to grow up in the countryside. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Although few individuals prefer to bring up their kids in a town, few others prefer to do that in a rural place. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the topic and provide my views in favour of the former.

Those who support raising their youngsters in a remote place may argue that doing so will give a chance to breathe fresh air resulting in better health. Another prominent reason could be to make them aware of their surroundings and attached to countryside flora and fauna. For example, they might learn to manage domestic animals and general uses of plants like aloe-vera or tulsi. Similarly, owing to a large open space available, they might develop some sports like running or jogging whereas kids in a city will be more attached to electronic gadgets.

In my view, city life will offer enormous extra-curricular activities to kids. For instance, these city-dwellers can enroll themselves in a short-term course of basic computing skills, dance, photography, badminton to name a few. Later in their lives, when they will start looking for a job, they will be multi-talented and quite confident in comparison to others. Moreover, they, know how to adjust very well in a small space of an apartment or a big bungalow since they would have already seen a mix of people in their schools. These young lads will also be used to fast-paced city life where most of the jobs will be.

In conclusion, despite some good health and attachments to plants and animals which nurturing kids in a remote vicinity offers, we must take into consideration the benefits of extra-curricular activities and opportunities of a real-world experience a city life offers. Hence, I tend to agree that the benefits of city life for a lad outweigh the benefits of a rural life.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85148514851 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83092145124 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7035966788 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150926280078 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506393346116 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026076294062 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869413828849 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165412850006 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.