Some people work for the same organizations all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Organizations need people to work for them. It is also true that few individuals stay with a company throughout their lives whereas few others keep switching jobs. In this essay, I will discuss both sides and provide my view in favor of the former.
Those who support changing the workplace very frequently may argue that it is the best way possible to build-a-fortune since changing job gives them a raise every time. Another prominent reason people switch jobs is for their career growth. For example, if a person is stuck in an organization and does not see vertical growth options, a natural solution that comes to mind is to look for an opportunity outside the current one. As a result, he might get better salaries as well as senior positions.
In my view, one should try to stick to the company as long as he/she can. The benefits are manifolds. First of all, when you stay in an organization for a long time, everyone knows you by name and your respect automatically rises for the effort you have put in through the years. For instance, if you started your career with a startup and have grown in ranks with it, everyone is bound to know you and will value your opinion. It also helps in case your company sees a bad time doing layoffs, you are a proven gem whereas in a new organization you will still be testing waters. Moreover, usually, when people work in a single office for long, they build their homes nearby and their families settle in. Their kids start going to nearby schools and colleges. If in case, that person will switch jobs, his whole family will have to relocate, jeopardizing kids' studies.
In conclusion, despite the better perks and career growth that a job change offers, we must take into consideration the factors of stability for an individual and his family. In my opinion, giving a stable life to your family is more just, and justice is paramount.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is more just, and justice is paramount.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71171171171 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62095936377 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606606606607 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0175450546 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300647937492 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905795246506 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938552943137 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174153997197 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505019389353 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.