Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Although a section of our society believes that people themselves cannot bring a change to the environment and only the governments can do that, I do not concur with this statement and opine that everyone including individuals, companies, and the government will have to act jointly for such a big cause. In the essay, I will provide my point-of-view with examples.
On one hand, the people who advocate for the government and the big organizations to take ownership of improving our biosphere may say so since authority to make decisions and huge grants are required, which a common person will never have. It will be quite challenging for a person without any rights to ask a neighbour state to help and work with him. This would be taken up more seriously if two governments, capable of making and executing decisions, talk to each other. For example, The Great Barrier Reef extends from Australia to New Zeland, and even if Australian residents work it out from their side, the problem will never be fully resolved. Additionally, any initiative addressing such a massive problem will need grants from the government or corporations only. Hence, the above example supports the view that governments and organizations need to step up to tackle this issue.
On the other hand, in my view, we inhabitants can definitely help our ecosystem by means of reducing our carbon footprint and generating less waste. Carbon Dioxide has been blamed for a hole in the ozone layer and is affecting our earth negatively. In order to diminish its effects, one can cut down on car usage and start using public transport for travel. Similarly, people can start focussing on recycling plastic items, producing less garbage. As a result, any small contributions from each of us can have a much bigger impact on saving our environment.
In conclusion, despite the authority and funds issue which only large corporations or the state can provide, we must take into consideration the small steps like less dependency on car usage and using recycled products which are quite impactful. In my opinion, everyone including, people, governments, and large companies will have to work together to protect our ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, similarly, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06611570248 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86885205913 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586776859504 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2993108693 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.6 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163621791078 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484366533224 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503743263621 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105370221909 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464035833749 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.