Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
A significant number of children pass their time by enjoying TV shows in recent days. According to some people, television can never be a learning instrument like book and children are becoming less knowledgeable than before. I strongly agree with this statement because television programs are mainly entertainment oriented and addiction to TV hampers social communication activities.
First of all, majority of child programs focus on the amusement facts rather than educational perspective. It is commonly observed that kids love to watch cartoons instead of any documentary. By repeatedly watching these trivial telecasts they are wasting their valuable time. As a result they are not gaining any knowledge that they could have learned by reading a book. Furthermore, children may misuse television and watch inappropriate broadcasting when they are alone in their home.
Secondly, youngsters may get addicted towards electronics device such TV, Computer, mobile etc and miss the real enjoyment of playing with friends. It is a common phenomenon nowadays that most of the urban child suffers with obesity. This is because they do not spend quality time in outdoor activities and occupy themselves with movie and computer games. This practice also hinders their psychological development whereas reading books improves imagination power and makes people more creative.
To recapitulate, books are more educative and television cannot alter books as an educational device and fails to formulate a better knowledge base among the young generation. The main reasons are television cannot serve the purpose of educating adolescents and affects their health and mental growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s they are wasting their valuable time. As a result they are not gaining any knowl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63779527559 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94287059195 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673228346457 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1883398581 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293220597164 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870844513238 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050428420439 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165374129592 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486513262213 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.