Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Some people propose today that youth are not as brilliant as they used to be in the past, and this drop in their intellectual abilities is largely being linked to excessive time they spend on watching TV. In fact, children are being expected to give up watching TV in favour of reading books, which they believe shall help reverse the decline in their intellect.I however, neither believe that children have grown less brilliant today, nor that TV makes them duller.
I personally feel that considering TV merely a source of entertainment would be an extremely short-sighted vision, as its benefits are not confined to this aspect only. To elaborate, children nowadays are smart and ,also, they are the generation of tech savvies. They, hence, may not like the learning in a conventional way; they rather prefer interactive and visualised lessons presented on-screen. Owing to that, educational content available on TV helps them learn more practically and innovatively.
Furthermore, as far as the matter of modern day children being less educated is concerned, there are several examples to prove the contrary. For example, videos casting children, solving extremely complex mathematical theories and doing unbelievable calculations in the matter of few seconds only are a commonplace on internet. Their intelligence expands beyond subjective knowledge even as they are also aware of their surroundings as well as major global issues. Irrefutably, informative medias like TV are to thank, mainly, for imparting such consciousness in them.
To recapitulate, Television should be viewed as a source of knowledge for children as it encourages practical learning in an interesting manner and also empowers youth with knowledge. Also, books reading along with interactive learning can help children become more creative. However, the proportion of time allocated to watching TV must be supervised strictly by parents to minimise its detrimental side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
... reverse the decline in their intellect.I however, neither believe that children ...
^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aborate, children nowadays are smart and ,also, they are the generation of tech sa...
^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a conventional way" with adverb for "conventional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... They, hence, may not like the learning in a conventional way; they rather prefer interactive and vis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an interesting manner" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ren as it encourages practical learning in an interesting manner and also empowers youth with knowledge....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, may, second, so, well, for example, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43894389439 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02997618792 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620462046205 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1161071089 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.769230769 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20544276081 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697940468153 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045136804966 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122178238589 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038093259953 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.