Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television can not replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is an irrefutable fact that, television has become the ultimate source of entertainment, and all age of people spend more time with this gadget. Some people opine that, television can not take place of book and in result of children are lack in education. However, I strongly disagree with this statement as television has detrimental effects on education system.
To begin with, children have become creative and innovative in this fast pace life. There is not any argue that, the television has played vital role in this phenomenon. By watching plethora kind of video channels pupils learn from others and it might possibilities, that they find career in these field. Books have incredible impact on children, but television is not comparable tools, as they learn innumerable practical skills by watching videos. Additionally, television can be used as information source, because TV channels provide news, historical stories, information regarding creatures and planets. Pupils become curios to know new things rather than become less educated.
On the contrary side, there are some detrimental impacts by giving enormous time with television because, children become stubborn and their eyesight also affected. Sometime children use television for only to entertain themselves, and waste their golden learning time. Books are imperative in children life as profound tool of learning. Education of children much important in this ultra modern era and, by watching more television pupils might become less educated as compared with those, who love to read books.
In conclusion, television and books are different source as learning aspects and both have individual role in children life. Television has not any key role, if children become less educated by watching it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, in conclusion, kind of, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44202898551 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78013552532 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2225396811 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394303928075 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143749973178 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608536323197 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266734125255 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410718453216 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.