Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is an irrefutable fact that, tourism industries are booming nowadays. Some people opine that, visiting and entry charges of historical and cultural places for foreign people should be more, while others have contrary views on this statement. But, I agree with former verdict, that international tourists should be charged more than locals.
To begin with, tourism businesses have become well earning source for many countries and their's economy also rely on them. Nations are developing plethora of historical places for local and international visitors which require enormous money. Additionally, Prominent places where innumerable foreigners are coming, and local authorities have to provide profound amenities to international visitors as they could be help to enhance more visitors. For instance, in India Taj Mahal is one of the wonder in world which can attract more visitors from foreign, and charges for entry of them are high. Foreign people are charges relatively same as per international standard rate, so it can not become burden on them.
On the other hand, if any country discriminate between foreign tourists, then it create negative impact on other countries. In consequences, there could be slump in number of visitors entry from outside. Tourism industries could be affected, but many countries provide outstanding amenities to their visitors and used extra money to ameliorate it. Foreign visitors could not feel bad because rate of visiting such places are relatively less as per their standard of living.
In recapitulation, there is nothing wrong about charges more to foreign people because against charges nations and local authorities have to develop cultural and historical places. Foreign money could help profoundly as compare to locally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...inate between foreign tourists, then it create negative impact on other countries. In ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...isiting such places are relatively less as per their standard of living. In re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52014652015 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78015945342 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8827362785 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.642857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338293646665 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111666141236 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886971202792 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212112388938 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911972891317 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.