Some people believe that all the company decisions should be taken by the managers whereas others think it is better to include employees while making decisions. Discuss both view and give your opinions.
It is an irrefutable fact that employees are incredible assets of companies, and theirs opinions should be considered to take decisions. However, some people opine that, companies' managers are enough to decide and should not rely on workers of companies. But, I strongly believe that, Organisations are run by employees, so they are equally crucial for companies' decisions.
To begin with, employees play vital role in companies, and if any decision taken by companies is highly affected to theirs workers despite of managers and top level managements. Therefore, employees can opine profoundly as they understand well merits and demerits of decisions. Additionally, managers may not advice in favour of workers sometime such as subjects on production related issues, wages of workers, satisfaction factors of employees and obstructions faced by lower level workers. Moreover, if workers of organisations feels theirs values in company, then they will work more efficiently. This Phenomenon ideally make any company profitable in long way and earns employees loyalty
On the contrary side, some companies think involving employees in their decisions is waste of time and energy. many big organisations run by thousand of employees, and asking for their opinions can create chaos among workers as sometimes some of them on opposite side. Therefore it is important to run companies by taking decisions by indulging only managers.
In recapitulation, companies can not function well without workers uphold. So it is pivotal that, the employees should be involved in companies determinations, if it is directly or indirectly affected them. This Phenomenon ideally make any company profitable in long way and earns employees loyalty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
... decisions is waste of time and energy. many big organisations run by thousand of em...
^^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ometimes some of them on opposite side. Therefore it is important to run companies by tak...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n long way and earns employees loyalty.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55849056604 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05929068952 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558490566038 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4445339418 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245810322312 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892773285162 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578766341316 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1558640754 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202530022643 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.