Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role of the teacher in education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A section of society believes that because these days excess usage of computers in the field of education sooner can make the existence of tutors from the system. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the statement, since the reason behind this is human touch is required to teach humans.
Firstly, students are notorious in nature they cannot be managed without supervision and computers do not have a quality to handle human behaviour. In other words, discipline is needed which can only be taught by teachers since they understand how and when to be strict to control children. For example, due to COVID 19, all the school and colleges are encouraging online education these days, but it is been reported that at one point of time it has become mundane. Due to which adolescents have started misbehaving in the class which can be alleviated by punishing them. However, robots are only programmed to teach and not for their mischiefs.
Secondly, the expense of a computer will be greater than the wages offered to a tutor. Since it is a machine it required upgrades and such technology is not cheap but an educator themselves increases their knowledge so that can sustain the field. For instance, on average, the cost of system up-gradation is into millions which are not even close to the salaries given to an instructor. As a consequence, to this education will be a costly and enormous amount of parents will not be able to effort.
To conclude, the usage of computers is too much these days, but it will never replace teachers. Because human behaviour can only be handled under surveillance and the maintenance cost of technology is too high to manage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to teach and not for their mischiefs. Secondly, the connection is pivotal to u...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elps students to be successful in life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91475409836 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72676522442 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547540983607 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.034171816 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196058817484 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707646824247 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354413091075 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125394912492 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177437102126 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.