Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will soon be no role of the teacher in education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A section of society believes that because these days excess usage of computers in the field of education sooner can make the existence of tutors from the system. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the statement, since the reason behind this is human touch is required to teach humans and AI will be costly.
Firstly, students are notorious in nature they cannot be managed without supervision and computers do not have a quality to handle human behaviour. In other words, discipline is needed which can only be taught by teachers since they understand how and when to be strict to control children. For example, due to COVID 19 all the school and colleges are encouraging online education these days, but it is been reported that at one point of time it has become mundane. Due to which adolescents have started misbehaving in the class which can be alleviated by punishing them. However, robots are only programmed to teach and not for their mischiefs.
Secondly, the expense of a computer will be greater than a wages offered to a tutor. Since it is a machine it required upgrades and such technology is not cheap but an educator themselves increases their knowledge so that can sustain the field. For instance, on an average the cost of system upgradation is into millions which is not even close to the salaries given to an instructor. As a consequences to this education will be costly and enormous amount of parents will not be able to effort.
To conclude, the usage of computers is too much these days, but it will never replace teachers. Because human behaviour can only be handled under surveillance and the maintenance cost of technology is too high to manage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to teach and not for their mischiefs. Secondly, the expense of a computer will...
^^^^
Line 4, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of parents will not be able to effort. To conclude, the usage of computers is t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st of technology is too high to manage.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89045936396 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71695375477 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579505300353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1243969224 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229034104409 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782738234443 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636343306677 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12898817816 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556219785338 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.