In today’s tech savy world, there is almost no field where computers are not used. Children being taught concepts in a new and informative way through computers, yet it has some side-effects. These downfalls cannot impact the positive impact that computers have on education.
Firstly, access to millions of books, applications to take maintain notebooks and the web to search for information, is all provided within a small computer. This increases the effectiveness of the students and saves time. Secondly, with the use of wide-screen projectors, students are subjected to a new way of audio-visual learning. Concepts involving 3D shapes can easily be explained to students with clear understanding. Thirdly, a passion towards technology is developed amongst the students, which can lead to research and innovation in the future.
There are some problems associated with extensive use of computers. Firstly, the student teacher relationship will decline as students would prefer to look up answers on the internet rather than ask their fellow teachers. Secondly and most importantly, being glued to a screen raises some health issues. Itchiness and dryness of the eyes, neck and back aches are the most common problems that affect children. Thirdly, cost of procuring a new laptop or computer cannot be afforded by every student or school. Maintenance of the same is another headache for some.
Although, we see that use of computer in education has some negative health and socio-economic impact, but it cannot outweigh the positivity it instills in the minds of a student. I conclude by stating that computers should and mus be used in schools.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31558935361 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95841437056 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1131541413 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.375 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156387043359 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503136892098 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393632100445 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101439186331 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453159382673 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.