Consumer goods have become the most important part of people's life. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
With the advent of technology, much advancements related to consumable items happened, which made everyone's life easy. This essay will explain why these advancements have more benefits than drawbacks.
First and foremost, human power, time and efforts could be saved by giving simple instructions to machines with few clicks. Furthermore, many technological gadgets like mobile and electrical appliances such as washing machine, vacuum cleaner, have become a vital part of daily life to help human beings in their day-to-day household activities such as cleaning and cooking. For instance, LG company launched an automated washing machine in 2016, which was a breakthrough for all housewives in India because it hardly needs any human help to wash as well as dry clothes. Secondly, people can utilise their spare time prudently to improve health conditions by involving themselves in various sport activities. Moreover, they can download numerous applications from play store to enhance their cognitive skills because more than 70 per cent of the population uses android mobile phones nowadays.
However, this trend has some drawbacks as well because people are losing humane connection due to their increasing interest in consumable things. In addition, they are becoming more workaholic and isolated, to fulfill their demands of different materialistic things, by earning more money in the short time span. For example, a survey conducted by the 'Youth' magazine in 2018 demonstrated that young generation spends more than 60 per cent of day time in isolation, either doing work or busy with well-featured mobiles, which would beget lots of troubles especially diseases such as depression.
In conclusion, although consumer goods have some disadvantages, they offer many benefits when used wisely. They can support human life on a daily basis in every aspect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
With the advent of technology, much advancements related to consumable item...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51916376307 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84408932771 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686411149826 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2724189884 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126302011582 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457987761181 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384927654025 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825237616357 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241877959957 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.