Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In past few decades as a result of industrialization the world has turn into a global market. Some people hold the belief that having local products available across are the globe could have some negative implications.However, I tend to agree with the statement only up-to a some extent.
The first point worth making is that products are at near to customers than ever before because of globalization. For instance, a product made in Japan for Japanese people is being sold across the US. Having such a feature has multifarious benefits; it increases the sales opportunity for everyone, your commodities as a producer is not restricted to own country; national boundaries dissolve and you become a global retailer. The resulting world would be a one big country with no separation based on race or border.
Contrastingly, having our planet as a single country would have its own set of drawbacks. Especially, if all countries are same there will not be any cultural diversity among them and since the market always crater to demands of the public, there would be need of only specific commodity instead of having a variety.
Another point that needs to be considered is if all global products are being purchased it would have detrimental effect on the local markets and sellers as their items could be side-lined.
In conclusion, I would opine that having same items available across the globe is advantageous. However, few points such as decline of cultural diversity and local brands getting outpaced by multi-national corporations are points worth considering.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'turned'.
Suggestion: turned
...sult of industrialization the world has turn into a global market. Some people hold ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...e could have some negative implications.However, I tend to agree with the statement onl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18359375 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07164411327 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59765625 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7257625886 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.636363636 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104172964594 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418105357013 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0194371357297 0.0667982634062 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055237225698 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357626564512 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.