With the development of modern society is the loss of traditional ways of life. Is it important to keep our traditional ways of life? How can this be achieved?
Nowadays, it is often observed that traditional lifestyle ways are disappearing due to the effect of modernization. I consider that conventional ways of living should be preserved as they could prove beneficial for the generations to come. Moreover, governments have to take initiatives to make it possible.
To embark upon, it is really important to save our ancestor’s lifestyle and their teachings. It would aid us and the next generations to remain connected with our past, and we could learn numerous beneficial things from their culture. To illustrate it, these days, people especially children are more prone to various diseases due to the reason of unhealthy diet pattern, however, this problem can be overcome easily by adopting the natural ways of eating or following herbal products which were commonly used by our predecessors. Thus, preserving the old culture may help to improve the future as well as the current generation.
In order to attain the benefits of our previous generations in positive ways, governments have to play a crucial role. Firstly, they could incorporate the fundamental teachings and rules of our ancestors into the school curriculum. Consequently, students would become aware of their past and would inherit them automatically. Secondly, authorities should promote and encourage the personalities and organizations that have maintained the traditional styles and their belongings. Further, they could be used as a brand ambassador to spread this knowledge to other sections of society.
In conclusion, it is mandatory for us to keep the cultural and conventional aspects of our past people in order to uplift the current generation’s standards of living. To achieve this, governments could do efforts at the school level and also can promote specific individuals or groups concerned with this area.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51916376307 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17993457125 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5254068746 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201252891342 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584578065772 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451776755474 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119312398337 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245985958282 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.