Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution to these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
New advancement in technology has taken its toll on the environment. While some individuals argue that the only way out of this dilemma is to adapt a simpler life style, others believe that technology on its own can be used to eliminate the raised issue.
On the one hand, contemporary inventions have detrimental effects on human ecosystem. For example, giant machines can cut considerable number of trees in a span of one hour and turn a forest to a bare land. Guns are more sophisticated with their night vision features which makes it even harder for animals to escape being hunted. Furthermore, thanks to the new technologies, e.g., planes, drones and etc., nowhere is out of human reach. Remote landscapes which were ones considered untouched have become the new target for researchers and tourists. It seems that recent improvements have brought humankind more misery than benefit. Since there are machines which destroyed the peaceful environment, it is understandable that some people blame the technology for these disasters. People who support such theory state that nature can be saved if people return to the old way of life and let go off the technology.
On the other hand, although technology can be used for horrible purposes, it is not harmful on its own. First of all, we all have witnessed how beneficial technology can be to help the nature. For instance, remote cameras and sensors in Amazon jungles make it easier for authorities to observe and protect them from even natural disaster such as fire and react quicker. There are even firefighter robots and plane which can be sent to heated area to prevent the fire from progressing further. Secondly, social media can raise awareness on various threats which endanger our planet and encourage people to take a more environment friendly daily routine. I personally side with these people because I find their reasoning more logical and more importantly more feasible. I doubt that anyone can simply forget the convenience that accompanies new technologies and live without them.
In conclusion, although technology has caused lots of problems, we should never forget its benefits and instead of banning it altogether try to utilize it more thoughtfully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be used to eliminate the raised issue. On the one hand, contemporary inventions...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... new technologies, e.g., planes, drones and etc., nowhere is out of human reach. Remote ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 881, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...new technologies and live without them. In conclusion, although technology has c...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 138, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tries'?
Suggestion: tries
...ts and instead of banning it altogether try to utilize it more thoughtfully.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81383599137 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9177801031 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212943907325 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637872395427 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671453625625 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143178920178 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588655070803 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.