School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that pupils rely on computers, whether to do a research or find solutions to their math problems, so much so it affects their reading and writing competency. It is their belief that teachers must refrain from utilizing new technologies while conveying lessons and return to the traditional way of teaching. In my opinion, new advancements have had a great impact on the quality of education. Hence, I totally disagree with the proposed approach.
Firstly, computers provide vast number of opportunities to enhance the learning process. For example, in a classroom where everyone has its own laptop, all the students have the same chance to answer a question asked by the teacher whereas in the past only the most intelligent person always would have robed others the possibility of answering. In addition, according to research, individuals have different learning speed. Therefore, teaching students the same material over the same period of time without considering their various talents not only is unfair to the slow learners but also hinders the faster ones from achieving their full potential. This issue has been entirely resolved by introducing individual based courses which are monitored by artificial intelligence agents.
Secondly, in a world dominated by computers, it seems so far-fetched to assume that by practicing the old way of teaching youngsters would forget about this amazing technology and spend more time on reading or writing. This new machine has made its way to humans’ lives so permanently that no one can overlooks its advantageous and demands the cease of it usage. Besides, one can argue that the Internet has facilitated the spread of knowledge beyond the border of nations. Nowadays, students of a remote village in a third world country can reach the same resources provided to their peers in a developed country, thanks to the idea of free education. Therefore, it is safe to say that computers are just mere devices and it is up to human beings that how they want to employ them whether in a beneficial way or in a damaging one.
In conclusion, based on the reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe that the benefits of using computers in education system outweigh its disadvantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...tudents the same material over the same period of time without considering their various talen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'overlook'
Suggestion: overlook
...s; lives so permanently that no one can overlooks its advantageous and demands the cease ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 796, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a beneficial way" with adverb for "beneficial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at how they want to employ them whether in a beneficial way or in a damaging one. In conclusi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19398907104 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89863798754 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609289617486 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0069781304 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.733333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11372460327 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321464888184 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028282589946 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629118463544 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123286359946 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.