With the development of technology children are now living in a world that is completely different to what it was 50 years ago. What problems do this cause for society and the family?
Technological advancements have revolutionized the world for young generations. Today, everything has to be done faster and better ranging from education, shopping and even socialization. This new way of living certainly has some pros and cons, however, this essay would attempt to highlight some negative effects it posses.
First and foremost, the way technical advancement hampered the health of offspring cannot be ignored. These days, children follow a sedentary lifestyle as they are dependent on computers and mobile phones for almost everything they need ranging from education to friends. As per the recent research, the maximum numbers of patients reporting obesity-related issues are teenagers. Moreover, this new trend of making online friends is not good. As virtual friends can disappear overnight and this could affect the child psychology, in some instances, can prove fatal.
Secondly, the technology has badly affected the bonding families used to share in earlier times. Though mobile phones have eased the way of communication, however, it has been observed that family members hardly do personal interaction with each other. Meeting and talking in person is necessary for nurturing emotions among members. Further, after spending almost nine hours on screens in the office, parents feel tired and unable to keep a check on a child. Hence, the child ends up showing less interest towards studies and get inclined more towards games, which is not a good sign for societal growth.
Hence, it can be concluded that technology has affected our lives badly. For the better future, it’s important that it should be used to fulfil needs rather than making it as one of the need.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37313432836 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75924699405 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664179104478 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3237347451 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132765913905 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408128849901 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354877816246 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764928438555 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214382891465 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.