It is a proven fact that the vast majority of people now across the globe have been consuming a poor diet. Apparently, there could be numerous reasons for this, but most obvious is the lack of sufficient time to prepare at home in the fast-paced world and due to economic factors in a certain sector of society. Notwithstanding the potential problems, fortunately, there are answers available to overcome these consequences.
To begin with, there are two significant challenges for people thorough inclination to an unhealthy diet. Firstly, the hectic schedules, leaving no time to facilitate cooking in their kitchens. By this, I mean that to meet the personal and family demands in the competitive world everyone is rat-racing daily and it eventually substracting their valuable time. Secondly, due to financial impediments, a large number of people are unable to afford nutritious food and eventually, enforcing them reliant on a low-calorie diet. Knowing the fact that it could deteriorate their well-being it became inevitable for them. To exemplify this, a survey on people visiting fast food stalls across eighty-nine countries had revealed astonishing conclusions. A large number of individuals answered that their minimum daily wages are inadequate to shell out for a wide range of basic food items, which are deemed to be nourishing for health.
Despite the aforementioned reasons, however, there are ways to alleviate dependency on poor nutritious food. A way forward for this is appropriate and wise planning of a day. This is to say if a family containing a wife and husband should share chores among themselves intellectually as well as they must wholeheartedly prone to eating home food daily. By these stringent measures, they can significantly reduce eating junk food and as a result of this their overall health can be ameliorated. Another effective solution is careful budgeting on a monthly or weekly basis. Priority should be given to health and also set aside at least 20-30 percent of income for groceries. Besides, an alternative source to generate additional income shall be arranged so as to meet the unexpected foreseeable expenses.
In summation, I recapitulate that the views of dieticians are absolutely true people are desired to have poor nutritious food. Having said this, the reasons for this attitude is due to inappropriate work-life balance and financial stresses, however; clear prominent solutions such as adequate scheduling and decent fiscal discipline will resolve hindrances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...Secondly, due to financial impediments, a large number of people are unable to afford nutritious ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...s had revealed astonishing conclusions. A large number of individuals answered that their minimum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ate additional income shall be arranged so as to meet the unexpected foreseeable expense...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, at least, i mean, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3879093199 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07863801745 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599496221662 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5785024132 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.578947368 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116899686194 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359503195838 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348434273827 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0762601744053 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185523828793 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.