Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
The proliferation of supermarkets in rural and urban areas is on the rise. It is believed to be beneficial by some cohorts and damaging to the local businesses by others. While people with both the points of view continue to exist, I firmly believe that opening up of shopping malls helps local communities to flourish by leaps and bounds.
To initiate, proponents of the idea argue that international products render national investors out of business. As increasing numbers of cheap products are available to choose from, sufficient funds may not be available to local people to produce items of comparable quality. For instance, ever since the advent of China in the cotton and toys industry, native Indian fabric industry has almost shut down. This has also resulted in many individuals getting unemployed.
Contrarily, where such problems do occur, large shopping areas, in fact, aid to sustain local produce. Firstly, as competitors stock their articles from around the world, inhabitants of the area stand a better chance to sell their finished goods to a greater number of consumers. Generation of these increased amount of revenue would be a great consequence, therefore, enhancing the gross domestic product in return. Moreover, the establishment of supermarkets can help to feel pride among the masses. This can be cogent in cases where local items occupy shelves of supermarkets, enabling purchases by international customers. With effective marketing strategies, a brand might become popular ubiquitously.
All in all it can be concluded, it is imperative that growth and sustenance of supermarkets will fuel up the survival of local communities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37786259542 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01865931525 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667938931298 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2290609397 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182259052398 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552018987741 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624974283499 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111141605976 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567183922369 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.