Employers to give longer holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree?
Job motivation is the driving force for both the employee and the employer in order to achieve targets on both the ends. Growing concerns led the employer to shed light on providing longer holidays than that of benchmark in return of quality work being produced by employees. Despite this, I strongly disagree with the notion because it distracts employee from work who is on leave. Moreover, it creates excessive work pressure on available resources. This essay will demonstrate the impacts of longer holidays on employees.
To begin with, longer holidays shift employee's concern from work to other aspects of life. An employee on leaves have ample time to look for other options which might end up with unconvinced attributes related to current job. According to empirical research conducted in 2018 by the well known firm, Human Resource Solutions, revealed that employees who took longer leaves tend to be more unsatisfied and less focused to the targets. Admittedly, once they resumed to work it almost required two months to them to get back to routine as compared to employees who availed shorter leaves. Thus, seen in this light it is broadly believed that providing longer leaves to encourage employees is not a constructive approach.
Another insight that must not be neglected is that the work pressure of employee on longer leaves will eventually fall on the other workers. Consequently, the remaining workforce will have to deal with work stress which ultimately led them to exhaustion stage where blunders and employee turnover will increase. In a survey conducted at renowned multinational institution, Standard Chartered Bank, 80% of employees stated that they got depressed which leads to more errors with work when one of their colleague was on longer leaves. Consistent with this line of thinking, it is observed that longer leaves idea can be debunked as it is frustrated for working employees to bear the workload.
To conclude, employee encouragement is the tool for management to attain quality work from the employees but longer leaves will not suffice the purpose instead it distracts employee and build extra work pressure on available workforce. In my opinion, employers must have to look for other avenues such as cash bonuses and achievement awards to motivate employee rather than long leaves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivate employee rather than long leaves.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22666666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70779483877 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9287608376 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210007433935 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776971528165 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329486454585 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142748255932 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240709042808 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.