A growing population is a big problem in many countries. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or country side?
The populace across the globe is increasing rapidly and it has become a challenge for government to provide shelter to large majority of people. It is argued that diplomats should provide housing in cities that are already developed rather than country side. I strongly agree with the notion that policy makers should develop rural area that has barren land and are less developed. This essay will first discuss issues pertinent to growing population and secondly the benefits of building houses in villages followed by reasoned conclusion.
Since last few decades, the population is increasing at an alarming rate. It is agreed that India and China are the most populated countries and low space accommodation is introduced in these regions. However, these setups lack various factors which are mandatory for survival such as sanitary. For instance, in India the population per square kilometer is 382, which means that 3-4 families are sharing the space with single bathroom. Undoubtedly, the cleanliness and self-hygiene is on stake. This example is clearly a plausible argument that providing housing with all necessary amenities to increasing population is a huge issue these days.
In addition, either to develop skyscrapers and to enhance rural areas is the base precursor. Admittedly, building houses on barren land is beneficial in a way that land will be utilized. Moreover, it will ultimately grow rural areas into town and cities. For instance, services of Riaz Malik, the builder of Baharia town in Pakistan is remarkable who built the entire town with all basic utilities on an infertile land near highway between Karachi and Hyderabad. As a result, the shelter problem of growing population has been resolved to some extent along with growth of villages into town. Thus, it is agreed that providing homes in country side is constructive approach.
To conclude, swelling population is huge issue and in order to accommodate people building homes in countryside will help to establish rural areas into towns and it will be the best utilization of unproductive land. It is predicted that if legislative bodies will comply to this approach accommodation problems of increasing population will resolve.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80255357842 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559659090909 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6517624431 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208354108454 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663466534563 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699062453427 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125564523911 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509665794298 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.