Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Now a days, we observe that a lot of candidates may apply for a single position so, in order to shortlist relevant candidates, employers ask for candidate information that may also include enquiries for personal information such as hobbies and marital status. There is a disagreement between two school of thoughts where one believes that this information is useful while the other disagrees with this. I, personally, believe that getting information like hobbies/interests is usually useful in selecting right people for right job.
First, I would say that it is a win-win situation for employer and employee if a person is selected for the most suitable role as per his capabilities. To achieve this, information about the role and the candidate plays the vital role. As candidate should be aware of the demands and expectations of the job, similarly, employer should be aware about the profile of candidate and this can only be achieved by asking questions about the candidate. Some candidates may be professionally up to the mark for getting the job, but their interests may make them not suitable for that role. For example, if an Engineer is applying for a role of backend developer and his interest are to interact with people or to work in a lively environment. But the role may require working from home or this is maybe a short team with almost no interaction with other people. In this way, employer can guide the candidate that this job has a clash with you interests. Similarly, marital status can have some relationship to the role or job. So it is beneficial for both candidate and employer to have the personal information that may be relevant to job.
On the contrary, there is a school of thought who believes that asking personal information is not essential and this should not be enquired. They do argue that some people may not be comfortable in providing the information but due to their interest in the job they have no choice to provide. Furthermore, personal data provided can be misused and there is always a chance for data leakage. So, to avoid such situation, personal data gathering should be avoided.
Concluding the above discussion, I would say that asking for personal information that may be somehow relevant to the job is useful. Information may be disposed of after the completion of hiring process. Having all the relevant information is essential for assigning right person to the right role and that is beneficial for both the parties
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days, we observe that a lot of candidates ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
Now a days, we observe that a lot of candidates ma...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, similarly, so, while, for example, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93540669856 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88291012013 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452153110048 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1316915362 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.578947368 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514155503351 0.244688304435 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172794968516 0.084324248473 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089533268191 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350015606554 0.151304729494 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525675289847 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.