Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion
Working in this competitive environment has not only made the employee searching for better opportunities now and then, but also makes it a stressful job for the employers. Seeking for the best candidate is a very tough task. Moreover, while interviewing a person, it isn't easy to analyze, whether to ask for personal information or not, because sometimes few candidates do not find it comfortable sharing the information.
All the job seekers are not a confident or good speaker, but they have other relevant skills which might have interested the hiring team. Firstly, human resource teams usually use ice-breakers by asking personal information like, where do they stay or how they travel; so that the candidate can get into the comfort zone before moving to further questions. Secondly, by understanding the hobbies and interests of the person, the interviewer can identify the strengths and weaknesses of the person or sometimes can share their likes and dislikes about the event. For example, suppose an employee is good at playing team games, it's recognizable that he is a team player or a better coordinator concerning the sports he plays or if he has liked for tactful games like chess, he can be an analytical thinker, or he might be good with the planning things according to the situation.
On the other hand, few employees do not find it comfortable to share their personal information with the employers, most preferably the people above 45 years of age. As they have vast experience in their field, or they have good knowledge about the position, such employees have better skills in displaying their strengths by asking about their work experience. Employers can ask about the actual problems faced by their company, and based on the answer given by the candidate, they can evaluate whether the person has relevant skill sets or not.
Finally, it depends upon the interviewer based on their abilities and experience, on how the questions need to be framed so that the candidate can be judged effectively and they do not miss out on a good opportunity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...reover, while interviewing a person, it isnt easy to analyze, whether to ask for per...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00289855072 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83402082174 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547826086957 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3491220228 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.909090909 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3636363636 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295032800625 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110893838678 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323258320069 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166759254953 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581393986192 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.