Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is true that employees are sometimes asked to fill in forms that enquiry some questions such as their recreational activities and their marital status. While a group of people assert that these are confidential information and collecting them is futile for the employers, others find this information useful. I consider this personal information as valuable ones.
There are a variety of reasons why a group of people are against this scheme. Firstly, they claim that employees should choose their candidates based on their talents, qualifications and experiences not their interests and hobbies. Secondly, some of these questions are confidential and people may take it as an intrusion into their privacy. Finally, the marital status should not be a deterrent factor for the employers to opt their subordinates. To support my claim, I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that the most important indexes in job prosperity among the people who were aged between 25 to 40, were punctuality, perseverance and ambition and their family background has the lowest impact in their success.
On the other hand, I believe that this information can help employers to provide better working environment for their work force. Moreover, it helps them to offer appropriate recreational facilities for their subordinates. Take the Google Company for example, the managers of this prominent company could provide gym facilities at their work environment which help their employees to do some exercise which enhance their efficiency dramatically. They add this equipment according the employees’ interest. Moreover, this information helps the managers to find better job position for the job candidates.
In conclusion, although some of the information seems to be confidential, accessing them would help the job owners and managers to provide better job conditions for their employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... candidates. In conclusion, although some of the information seems to be confidential, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51351351351 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03006453535 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8715509495 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338125887274 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125741440008 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418694928248 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216429301872 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455860454317 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.