Essay topics: Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view.
Governmental expenditure, nation`s money which should be allocated carefully to develop the country, should be taken the highly consideration. It is believed that funding arts is a waste of the country`s budget, and it would be more useful if government directed these funds on other facilities such as health, education and infrastructure. I am of the opinion that art is not essential same as other important facilities, but its pivotal role cannot be forgotten. This essay will discuss firstly, other facilities that could be better, and secondly, the importance of arts in nation life, followed by a reasoned conclusion.
There are several channels which are imperative to be funded by government, and these should be taken the first priorities by any government. Basic facilities of the country, such as health, education, are extremely important for nation development; therefore, allocating sufficient funds for those are imperative. When people find these basic facilitates in an acceptable level, government can avoid a lot of problems which might be occurred. For example, low rate of youth violence is measured in some countries which secure good fund to their educational system, where in Finland.
On contrary, we cannot neglect the vital effect of the arts; thus, a suitable deposit should be considered while arranging the country`s rationalized budget. Arts has a significant positive consequence on individual as well as the country. It reflects the country culture and keeps nation to remember their old tradition, and it is also seducing many tourists to visit the country which their spending will enhance country`s economy. For instance, France is known as the Country of arts, and one of the key incomes to it is the tourism; therefore, securing enough fund to the arts is mandatory for country development.
In conclusion, it is important to concentrate in funding the essential facilities which have direct positive impact on the nation and the country, but we can not deny that arts is one of the channel that improve the country indirectly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35757575758 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09800729816 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3874671362 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128254815231 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051216658871 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489878636018 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767085617919 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704893729547 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.