Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
Nowadays, a lot of money is invested by the government on art. Such expenditure is argued as a wastage, and it has been recommended that it should be used elsewhere. Although public amenities are also important, I completely disagree with the above said argument.
To encourage people to choose an art stream, the government should spend money on art. It is a prevent the thought of people that art is trivial skills, and it is a leisure activity. The main reason behind this is the authorities do not provide career opportunities in this field. Owing to this perception they do not allow their children to choose art stream, and it is credible to some extent. For example, an artist earns a very penny amount every month, but on other hands, the salary of doctors, engineers, are very high. If state authorities spend money in the field of art and provide job opportunities to people, then people definitely motivated to choose this subject as a career.
Art helps people to recover from depression state. For instance, the NMHS hospital, Bangalore, which is an eminent mental hospital in India, reveals that the people, who were suffered from bipolar disorder have been recovered gradually when they encouraged by doctors to express their thoughts and feelings on canvas. As a result, some of them became famous artists. Art is a gift which helps people to spend their life without anxiety. Therefore, if the government spends on this field, then 50% of people who suffered from this bipolar disorder will get help to get rid of this.
In conclusion not only funding on art motivate people to choose the art field as a career but also it helps people to get rid of depression state. Therefore, I firmly agree that the government should spend money on art.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rnment should spend money on art. It is a prevent the thought of people that art is trivi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to art', 'to be'
Suggestion: to art; to be
...y do not allow their children to choose art stream, and it is credible to some exte...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88079470199 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63461529535 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513245033113 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3745152126 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31213463649 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111409619704 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733252897225 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188754083315 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515040214954 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.