Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?
In recent years, the governmental investment on the art has been gaining a great deal of attention throughout the society. Most importantly, the issue has been a bone of contention among the critics regarding the expenditure of the governmental fund on the art rather than other sectors. However, I completely disagree with this school of thought that sending on artistic activities are wasting of the government's money.
To begin with, since the art represents the culture and norms as well as history and tradition of any given society or country, therefore, better representation requires a strong emphasis from the government. Thus, the young aspirant artists will be more encouraged to develop more masterpieces that might represent the country in a global level. Another point is that, not everyone can create a mesmerizing art soon after their birth. Therefore, the innate power imagination is to be nourished in an organized approach. Owing to this, the government must spend money on art institutes as well as it should be well-incorporated into academic curriculum at the entry-level schools. Furthermore, getting continuous exposure of the arts and crafts from the early school life, the children will have a better psychological development. This is undoubtedly a wise investment for a better future of the country.
It is also true that despite the importance of art, human fundamental rights, for example, food, clothing, accommodation and others should be given more priority. Therefore, once the basics are covered by the government, they can put a constructive and calculated emphasis on the art. Practically, all the governments throughout the world maintain a budget for different sectors, therefore, based on economic aspects of any given country, they should allocate budget on the art after a certain level of sustainability is assured on other vital sectors.
All things considered, the art is an indispensable element of human civilization. Therefore, I believe, spending dollars on it will not go in vain and definitely will have better outcomes in the future if spent wisely and rationally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... artistic activities are wasting of the governments money. To begin with, since the art ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36526946108 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16879076234 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6406643343 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.466666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200503207206 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662538742967 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615212786994 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11357974335 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055068046219 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.