Even though globalization affects the world’s economies in a positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss.
The modern era of science and technology has certainly transform this world into a global village. In this regard, it is a general hypothesis that positive traits of globalization are uncountable. However, the negative aspects also require considerable attention. In fact, this essay will discuss both sides of above argument in detail further below.
To begin with, the outcomes of globalization are fairly helping different nations to fasten their pace onto the road of development. For example, the underdeveloped countries India, Malaysia are making the most from the prospects of globalization. Numerous multinational corporations are now establishing the office in underdeveloped countries due to the factor of cheap labor and reduce taxes. In addition, the employment ratio is rising rapidly. The overall economic stability is becoming more strengthen in the comparison to past trends. Lastly, USA and Europe are benefited as most of the trade is usually carried out in Euro and US dollar upholding their currency edge over others. Therefore, one can say that in most circumstances it is a win-win opportunity for every nation.
On the contrary, the downsides of globalization are causing a collateral damage as the other side of story. For instance, employment rate is the ever wide spreading in European countries as well as in US. Furthermore, the most impact of globalization is urging the distinct cultures too merge into a concept of unified culture leaving behind the individual elements of one's heritage. In short, the government of advance nations needs to counter the growing concerns.
To recapitulate, I pend down by saying that undoubtedly globalization is offering various benefits to developing communities, but the opposite aspects surely needs to be addressed for minimizing such effects globally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'transformed'.
Suggestion: transformed
...of science and technology has certainly transform this world into a global village. In th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'collateral damage'.
Suggestion: collateral damage
... downsides of globalization are causing a collateral damage as the other side of story. For instanc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to merge'?
Suggestion: to merge
...ization is urging the distinct cultures too merge into a concept of unified culture leavi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...aving behind the individual elements of ones heritage. In short, the government of a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17671323327 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652482269504 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8544960041 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113979908314 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032693964846 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370794328941 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695852649164 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509661050468 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.