Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Travel industry is flourishing nowadays since many people love to travel to foreign places and they travel thousands of miles for their love of travelling. Many people believe that foreigners should be charged higher than the local visitors. I, however completely disagree with this view.
Firstly, Travelling is an expensive hobby and while travelling to a new country all together one needs to make many arrangements and need to take care of numerous things such as- Visa processing, accommodation facilities, food to name a few.
All these necessities already burns a big hole on tourist’s pocket. On top of it when they are charged higher for visiting the historical buildings , it will take a toll on them which might lead to their disinterest in visiting the place again in future.
Secondly, I believe that charging extra fees from foreign visitors is unfair on ethical ground since this will make them feel discriminated and dissatisfy.
In addition to this, local residents barely give any importance to their historical heritage and they hardly visit any monument situated in their city. On the contrary, foreigners travel a great distance and spend a lot of money to make a visit.
For example- The symbol of love Taj Mahal which is situated in Agra. Local visitors hardly pay a visit to this wonderful symbolic structure even though the visiting charges are nominal for them. On the other hand there are people who travels miles just to have one look of this beautiful monument.
Furthermore, if the visitors feel discriminated they would never want to come back again subsequently it will have adverse effect on economy of the country since travel industry is one of the major contributors of in increasing the GDP of the country.
To recapitulate, foreigners make a great deal to visit another country. They put in so much of money and time to experience the heritage culture and to visit the historical buildings in person. Hence, the least the government could do is, reconsider the visiting charges for foreign visitors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er for visiting the historical buildings , it will take a toll on them which might...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...disinterest in visiting the place again in future. Secondly, I believe that charging e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f in increasing the GDP of the country. To recapitulate, foreigners make a great...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08284023669 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77313122392 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547337278107 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.604040763 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193594247854 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681240608777 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052205872175 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847672023319 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514778388481 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.